Stay Social. Stay Sane.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Lauren

Pages: [1]
1
Here's a doozy:

We recently lost our first child due to IC at 24 weeks and became pregnant again after our first cycle.

This has been an incredibly anxious pregnancy as a result.  I had a preventative cerclage at 13+5 and take daily progesterone suppositories (200mg).

I just came back from an elective ultrasound at 16 weeks. During this ultrasound, they found that my cervix had shortened to 2.4cm. I had a cerclage placed at 14 weeks, and it is sitting at 2cm on the cervix - it looks like a strong stitch with good placement.

They discovered during the vaginal ultrasound that I was having a contraction, and this may have influenced the cervix measurement (I'm hoping that because the contraction was low, it was the cause of a shortened cervix, but I have no medical info to back that up).  The tech told me that painless contractions are usual for many women during pregnancy and not to worry.  She was hoping that the contraction would resolve before the end of the exam, but it didn't. 

In addition to this, the US tech thought she saw funnelling through the contraction, leaving only .4cm between the stitch and the end of my cervix. The doctor said she didn't see any funnelling. Again, not sure what to think. How can two experienced professionals see two completely different things?

All of this has left me me anxiously wondering why I would have such a long contraction and whether or not it was in fact impacting my cervical length and whether I am funnelling and if I should take additional precautions.

Finally, and scariest of all, is that they found "sludge" in the intrauterine sac. This puts me at a higher risk of infection. Infection in the intrauterine sac means immediate delivery. They tried to reassure me that "sludge" is common with women with IC, and that it doesn't guarantee infection, it just increases the risk.

My mad Google online research has resulted in 2 findings:

1.  Women with short cervix and presence of sludge have a 50% chance of delivery prior to 24 weeks (2007 study).

2.  Age of gestation for women with cerclage is not impacted by the presence of sludge  (2010 study).

Has anybody else had a preventative cerclage and found out later that there is sludge in the amniotic fluid?  What were your outcomes?

Pages: [1]